Testing the persistence of shocks on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from a quantile unit-root test with smooth breaks
Chien-Chiang Lee (),
Omid Ranjbar () and
Energy, 2021, vol. 215, issue PB
The investigation of the stationarity of renewable energy consumption has become a new branch of research in energy economics due to its importance in macroeconomics and environmental sustainability. Whether shocks to renewable energy consumption (which may be related to the implementation of energy policies) have permanent/transitory effects has yet to be explored. This study applies an extension of the quantile unit-root test with smooth breaks to examine the stochastic properties of renewable energy consumption in the US economy and the 50 states plus the District of Columbia during 1960–2017. Unlike traditional unit-root tests, which fail to reject the unit-root hypothesis, our results reveal that the unit-root hypothesis is rejected for the renewable energy consumption series of the United States and for 32 of the 51 states/district. In these cases, any policy for encouraging renewable energy will not be effective as the consumption will quickly return to its trend path. The evidence also reveals the presence of asymmetric responses to shocks for different states. Policymakers should consider these effects when they develop energy policy. For some states, where large positive/negative shocks have long-lasting effects on renewable energy consumption, the government should implement strong policies to further develop renewable energy and thus achieve economic and environmental sustainability.
Keywords: Renewable energy consumption; Unit-root test; Quantile regression; Smooth breaks; Fourier expansion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 Q43 Q47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:215:y:2021:i:pb:s0360544220322970
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().