A quantifiable approach to the selection of criteria and indexation for comparison of the gas pipeline projects leading to the EU: Diversification rationality against securitisation?
Lukáš Tichý and
Energy, 2021, vol. 225, issue C
The EU is dependent on imports of natural gas, and it has followed the issue of energy security and the need to diversify suppliers. Its political discourse clearly shows a preference for reducing its dependence on Russia, even if it is necessary to incur high costs in order to do so. It turns out, however, that the possibilities for diversification are limited and the reality of the new projects may contradict it. The article identifies the economic and political criteria for the comparison of the gas pipeline project options and creates a methodological framework via the construction of an index for evaluation and comparison of the individual projects. The index is constructed on the basis of objectivization of criteria and reflects the long-term vision. It could give us arguments for explaining why new gas pipeline projects for transporting gas to Europe are realised (with Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream being particularly notable) regardless of diversification requirements and elapsed securitization.
Keywords: Natural gas; Pipelines; EU; Indexation; Diversification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:225:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221004874
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().