Experimental investigations to evaluate surfactant role on absorption capacity of nanofluid for CO2 utilization in sustainable crude mobilization

Krishna Raghav Chaturvedi, Ramesh Narukulla, Mahmood Amani and Tushar Sharma

Energy, 2021, vol. 225, issue C

Abstract: Carbon dioxide (CO2) utilization for oilfield applications is affected by viscous fingering which leads to premature breakthrough without showing any appreciable impact on oil recovery and storage. Therefore, to control these issues, CO2 is often injected with high viscous fluid i.e. nanofluid. However, nanofluid efficacy can be further improved by inclusion of a surfactant that not only increases specific area of CO2 [via interfacial tension (IFT) reduction] but also increases CO2 absorption capacity of nanofluid through formation of foam. Thus, in this study, a new colloidal solution of anionic surfactant (i.e. sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, 0.16–0.24 wt%) and polymer based single-step silica nanofluid of varying concentration (0.1–1.0 wt%) was proposed for subsurface carbon utilization in CO2 absorption, IFT reduction, and fossil fuel displacement. CO2 absorption experiments showed that absorption was positively influenced by pressure and NP concentration, while increasing temperature showed reverse impact on CO2 absorption. In addition, SDS ensured formation of a Pickering foam which made CO2 to retain inside for over 10 days (an increase of 67%) in SDS treated nanofluid, higher than 6 days of simple nanofluid. Pickering CO2 foam of SDS treated nanofluids was also envisaged for IFT reduction of crude oil, to identify role of these nanofluids in crude mobilization from porous reservoir. CO2 absorption capacity of nanofluid exhibited inverse relationship with IFT value of crude oil. Finally, displacement experiments were conducted which also support inclusion of SDS in silica nanofluid for reduced water cut and higher fossil fuel recovery from porous media. Initially, the oil recovery was only 42% with water and 52% with 1 wt% NP concentration. However, the highest oil recovery was 61% when 1 wt% NP/0.16 wt% SDS combination was used.

Keywords: CO2 utilization; CO2 storage; Fossil fuel; IFT Reduction; Nanofluid; Surfactant (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221005703
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:225:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221005703

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120321

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().