Air-breathing versus conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A parametric numerical study

Fatma Calili-Cankir, Mohammed S. Ismail, Derek B. Ingham, Kevin J. Hughes, Lin Ma and Mohamed Pourkashanian

Energy, 2022, vol. 250, issue C

Abstract: Two mathematical models have been built for air-breathing and conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells to explore the reasons affecting the cell performance. A parametric study has been conducted to (i) investigate how each type of fuel cells responds to changes in some key parameters and (ii) consequently obtain some insights on how to improve the performance of the air-breathing fuel cell. The conventional fuel cell significantly outperforms the air-breathing fuel cell and this is due to substantially higher forced convection-related heat and mass transfer coefficients associated with the conventional fuel cell as compared with natural convection-related heat and mass transfer coefficients associated with air-breathing fuel cell. The two types of fuel cell respond differently to changes in porosity and thickness of gas diffusion layer: the conventional fuel cell performs better with increasing porosity of gas diffusion layer (from 0.4 to 0.8) and decreasing thickness of gas diffusion layer (from 700 to 100 μm) while the air-breathing fuel cell performs better with decreasing porosity and increasing thickness of gas diffusion layer. Further, the air-breathing fuel cell was found to be more sensitive to membrane thickness and less sensitive to electrical resistance compared to conventional fuel cell.

Keywords: Air-breathing PEFCs; Conventional PEFCs; Natural convection; Forced convection; Heat and mass transfer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222007307
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:250:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222007307

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123827

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().