A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis

Hareb Al-Jabri, Probir Das, Shoyeb Khan, Mohammad AbdulQuadir, Mehmoud Ibrahim Thaher, Kent Hoekman and Alaa H. Hawari

Energy, 2022, vol. 251, issue C

Abstract: Marine microalgae biomass could offer a viable feedstock for sustainably producing biofuel by hydrothermal liquefaction. In this study, five promising marine microalgae (i.e., Tetraselmis, Picochlorum, Synechococcus, Chroococcidiopsis, and Dunaliella), having different characteristics, were studied for biocrude oil production. The overall microalgal biocrude oil production process was divided into six unit operations: water supply, CO2 supply, nutrient supply, cultivation, harvesting, and HTL process. Models were developed for these unit processes such that once the key parameters of any unit process are known, the corresponding energy consumption could be determined. While the selection of the cultivation site influenced the energy requirements for sourcing seawater and CO2, the characteristics of the strain influenced energy requirements for the other four-unit operations. A cradle-to-grave concept was assumed to compare the life cycle assessment of the five strains. Among these strains, Tetraselmis sp. provided the most favorable energy balance with a net energy gain of 1.77 GJ/barrel of biocrude, an energy return on investment value of 2.81, and GHG reduction potential of 129 kg CO2 equivalent/barrel of biocrude. Further investigation with sensitivity analysis confirmed that the net energy yield for Tetraselmis sp. was least affected by a ±10% variation of the parameters of the unit processes.

Keywords: Marine microalgae; HTL; Bio-crude; LCA; EROI; Carbon footprint; Raceway cultivation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422200857X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:251:y:2022:i:c:s036054422200857x

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123954

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().