Identification of early opportunities for CO2 sequestration—worldwide screening for CO2-EOR and CO2-ECBM projects
Kay Damen,
André Faaij,
Frank van Bergen,
John Gale and
Erik Lysen
Energy, 2005, vol. 30, issue 10, 1931-1952
Abstract:
A study has been performed to identify potential worldwide opportunities for early application of CO2 sequestration. An early opportunity is defined as a high-purity CO2 point source, which can provide CO2 at low costs to oil or coal fields, where the CO2 is sequestered, and simultaneously enhance oil production (CO2-EOR) or coal bed methane production (CO2-ECBM). A Geographical Information System (GIS) was used to combine worldwide CO2 point sources and oil and coal fields. This resulted in 429 potential source–oil field and 79 source–coal field combinations. A multi-criteria analysis (MCA), in which technical and socio-economic criteria are taken into account, was applied to rank the source–reservoir combinations generated by the GIS exercise. Some of the most promising cases were considered in more detail to select four illustrative cases for further study: two potential enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects and two potential enhanced coal bed methane recovery (ECBM) projects. Case 1 consists of a hydrogen plant in Saudi Arabia, which could sequester 0.26Mt/year CO2 in a depleted oil reservoir at a net saving of approximately 3€/t CO2. EOR case 2 is a hydrogen plant in California, USA, which has to be retrofitted in order to generate a pure CO2 stream. Approximately 0.28Mt CO2 could be stored annually. Mitigation costs have been estimated at 9–19€/t CO2, depending on the availability of steam for CO2 regeneration. In cases 3 and 4, circa 0.68 and 0.29Mt CO2 from ammonia plants in China and Canada could be sequestered annually in coal fields for ECBM production at approximately 5 and 6€/t CO2, respectively.
Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544204004621
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:30:y:2005:i:10:p:1931-1952
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.10.002
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().