EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Thermodynamic analysis and life cycle assessment of the preferred supercritical water gasification coupled system for energy self-sufficiency: From food waste to hydrogen

Runqiu Dong, Hanbing Jia, Jianghua Tian, Liang Wu, Zhigang Liu, Zhiyong Peng, Jialing Xu, Kui Luo, Hui Jin, Bin Chen and Liejin Guo

Energy, 2025, vol. 317, issue C

Abstract: Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) technology can result in the resourceful and harmless conversion of organic waste into hydrogen-rich gas due to the homogeneous reaction environment of heat absorption and reduction. However, currently designed uncoupled SCWG systems supply the heat required for gasification heat absorption by elevating the supercritical water enthalpy, resulting in harsh heat transfer environments and energy losses. This paper developed a coupled system integrating the gasification reactor with the oxidation reactor through a bushing to reduce the temperature of the oxidation reactor. A comprehensive comparison of the thermodynamic performance and environmental burden of coupled and uncoupled systems for treating food waste was conducted. The coupled system directly transfers the heat of 727.80 kW–1491.75 kW from the oxidation reactor to the gasification reactor through the bushing, reducing oxidation temperature by 162 °C–368 °C to save combustible gas consumption. The energy efficiency of the coupled system was improved by 5.25 %–13.73 % over the uncoupled system under different conditions. Life cycle assessment (LCA) revealed that employing carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology can reduce the GWP of the coupled system to 0.31 kg CO2-eq/kg H2, which was only 35.23 % of that of the uncoupled system. Exergy flow analysis further indicated that the oxidation reactor, heat exchanger, and cooler are the largest sources of energy loss in the system. The coupled system can control the oxidation reactor temperature with direct heat transfer, resulting in a decrease in 795.91 kW exergy loss of these units. This work would be of great value for the optimal design of the SCWG system.

Keywords: Supercritical water gasification; Thermodynamic analysis; Life cycle assessment; Hydrogen; Food waste (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225001951
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225001951

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134553

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225001951