Boosting the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with porous flow fields: Pros and cons

Pablo A. García-Salaberri, Andrea Perego, Rui Wu and Iryna V. Zenyuk

Energy, 2025, vol. 318, issue C

Abstract: The design of the cathode flow field plays a relevant role in the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC). Recently, porous flow fields have emerged as an alternative to conventional rib/channel flow fields (e.g., serpentine flow field) in an attempt to increase PEMFC performance. In this work, we aim to shed light on pros and cons of both bipolar plate types by analyzing transport through porous and rib/channel flow fields using experimental and numerical work. The experimental polarization curves and oxygen transport resistance data of a cathode porous flow field are used to validate the numerical model. Then, a comprehensive parametric study of the model is presented, involving both operating and constructive parameters. The results show that the main advantages of porous flow fields are: (i) the improvement of oxygen transport, (ii) the decrease of flooding in the cathode MEA, and (iii) the increase of the distribution homogeneity in the in-plane direction of physical parameters (e.g., current density and temperature). In contrast, the main disadvantages are: (i) the potential effect of electrical contact resistances between porous surfaces, and (ii) the decrease of the water removal drag force in the cathode channel. The above two issues can be mitigated using: (i) thinly manufactured foams and/or increasing the assembly compression, and (ii) hybrid porous flow fields that incorporate a rib/channel pattern with fine pore-size porous ribs.

Keywords: Porous flow field; Rib/channel flow field; Performance; Oxygen transport; Modeling; PEMFC (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225003706
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:318:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225003706

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134728

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().