A numerical-based evaluation framework for ventilation airflow forms in small office: Energy efficiency, comfort, cleanliness, and anti-infection level
Minghua Chi,
Xiangguo Zeng,
Diya Hou,
Licong Wang,
Baochun Li and
Hongye Jiang
Energy, 2025, vol. 322, issue C
Abstract:
Different mechanical ventilation strategies contribute variably to the ideal indoor microenvironment. In this study, the performance and differences in indoor microenvironments across 12 airflow forms are explored by the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) investigation. Utilizing the CFD dataset, a numerical decision-making framework is proposed to evaluate airflow forms based on multiple ventilation indicators. This framework allows for assessing and selecting airflow forms tailored to various design targets, such as energy efficiency, comfort, cleanliness, and anti-infection level, to balance resource and demand. The single-objective and multi-objective decision-making results exhibit distinct differences due to the varied performance of different airflow forms across various ventilation indicators. For single-objective decisions, the optimal ventilation designs are SV-CASE1 for energy efficiency, DV-CASE1 for comfort, CJV-CASE for cleanliness, and SV-CASE2 for anti-infection level. It is worth noting that the best performances are observed at the air change rate of 7ACH. When considering a multi-objective decision incorporating all four indicators, the ideal designs are DV-CASE1 for prioritized energy efficiency, comfort, or cleanliness and SV-CASE2 for primary focus on the anti-infection level. The research findings and the developed numerical framework provide building designers with a theoretical pre-design scheme to help select appropriate ventilation strategies tailored to specific design preferences.
Keywords: Small office; CFD investigation; Ventilation and airflow system; AHP-entropy weight method; Multi-objective decision and design; Evaluation framework (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422501182X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s036054422501182x
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135540
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().