Revealing the critical impact of CO2/(CO2+CO) ratio in different gas-to-methanol processes: Plant-wide modeling and scenario analyses

Leiyu Zhang, Zongyue Tang, Lei Wang, Ruxing Gao, Ki-Won Jun, Seok Ki Kim, Chundong Zhang, Yingju Yang, Hui Wan and Guofeng Guan

Energy, 2025, vol. 333, issue C

Abstract: In the context of global carbon neutrality and stringent environmental constraints, gas-to-methanol (GTM) process has emerged as a pivotal pathway for sustainable methanol production. The CO2/(CO + CO2) ratios in the intermediate syngas have crucial influences on the reaction and process performances. However, the lack of consensus on the optimal CO2/(CO + CO2) ratio complicates the systematic optimization of existing GTM processes. With this challenge in mind, the reactor-level kinetic study and system-level techno-economic analysis are implemented to quantitatively investigate the feasibility, sustainability, and profitability of the different process scenarios in the range from 0.2 to 0.6. Herein, three distinct scenarios are proposed: current scenario using steam reforming technology, transitional scenario using CO2/Steam-mixed reforming technology, and future scenario using CO2/O2-mixed reforming technology. As a result, the reactor-level kinetic analysis suggests high CO2/(CO2+CO) ratios suppress the formation of byproduct dimethyl ether. Nevertheless, the system-level techno-economic analyses indicate the appropriate CO2/(CO2+CO) ratio (0.3), rather than extreme values, favors energy and exergy efficiency, carbon mitigation as well as cost saving. This study provides deep insights into the role of CO2/(CO2+CO) ratios in GTM processes and offers a scientific foundation for optimizing GTM processes.

Keywords: Gas-to-methanol; Natural gas reforming; CO2/(CO2+CO) ratio; Kinetic analysis; Scenario analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225029962
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:333:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225029962

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137354

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().