Hydrogen-based synthetic fuel production from excavated waste: life cycle techno-environmental-economic choices of technical routes and targeted products

Jiehong Tang, Yuting Tang, Hongyu Liu, Ziwei Sun, Jingmin Deng, Songbing Peng, Xiaowen Liang, Xiaojing Wang, Haohang Huang, Zejie Zheng, Weilong Chen and Xiaoqian Ma

Energy, 2025, vol. 334, issue C

Abstract: Organic content in the excavated waste (EW) can be a sustainable feedstock source for hydrogen-based fuel (HBF) production, which includes H2, NH3, methanol (MeOH), and liquefied natural gas (LNG). In this study, various EW-to-HBF (EWtHBF) systems with different technical routes are proposed, and based on the Aspen Plus simulation results, exergy analysis, life cycle assessment (LCA), and life cycle cost (LCC) are conducted to evaluate the techno-environmental-economic (3E) performance. For reforming routes, the traditional water gas shift (WGS) integrated with acid gas removal (AGR) and new-proposed sorption-enhanced water gas shift (SEWGS) are compared, while for feed gas ratio adjustment method, end-stream remixing and midstream bypassing are discussed. The results showed that applying SEWGS and midstream bypassing adjustment method can comprehensively improve the 3E performances in all schemes. The optimal ηex for H2, NH3, MeOH and LNG production is respectively ∼59 %, ∼55 %, ∼62 %, and ∼61 %. The targeted production of H2, LNG, and MeOH is the respective best choice from the perspectives of economic-take-all, environmental-take-all, and economic-environmental-parallel. Sensitivity analysis shows that the HBF selling prices are the most influential factor. Economically speaking, if the H2 selling subsidy is cancelled, the production of NH3 and MeOH can be suitable substitutions.

Keywords: Enhanced landfill mining; Hydrogen-based fuel; Life cycle assessment; Sorption-enhanced water gas shift (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225032852
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:334:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225032852

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137643

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().