Life cycle assessment of two automobile components: metal versus plastic

Fausto Freire, Diana Rosa, Pedro Silva, Gonçalo Tomé and João Malça

Energy, 2025, vol. 335, issue C

Abstract: Stringent tail pipe emission rules and fuel economy improvements to tackle the climate crisis are driving automakers to produce lightweight vehicles. Although lightweighting is an important strategy to reduce the environmental impacts of vehicles, it may also have disadvantages, as some lightweight materials have higher embodied impacts. Therefore, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is crucial to balance the environmental benefits from lightweighting at the use stage with the burdens of producing lightweight materials. This article presents an LCA to evaluate and compare the environmental impacts of two automobile armrest alternatives –metal (heavier) versus plastic (lighter)–, for two system boundaries: cradle-to-gate vs. cradle-to-grave. The comparison of impacts between the metal and plastic armrests is very different: from cradle-to-gate, the metal armrest presents the lowest impacts in all categories; however, from cradle-to-grave (lifetime travel distance 200000 km), is the opposite, since the higher weight of the steel armrest (+26 % compared to the plastic armrest) leads to higher use impacts due to increased mass-induced fuel consumption. Break-even points (equal impacts for the armrest alternatives) are also calculated as a function of the travel distance: from 14000 km (photochemical oxidant formation) to 120100 km (human toxicity), which emphasizes the need for an LCA not restricted to GHG. This article shows how lightweight materials with higher embodied environmental impacts may result in lower lifecycle impacts, emphasizing the importance of an LCA to evaluate the benefits of lightweighting. A robust LCA (not limited to GHG) is required to successfully curb the environmental impacts of transportation.

Keywords: Automotive; Car; Environmental; LCA; Lightweight; Vehicle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225038988
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225038988

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138256

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().