Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant
Ana M. Blanco-Marigorta,
M. Victoria Sanchez-Henríquez and
Juan A. Peña-Quintana
Energy, 2011, vol. 36, issue 4, 1966-1972
Abstract:
Exergetic analysis is without any doubt a powerful tool for developing, evaluating and improving an energy conversion system. In the present paper, two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a 50MWe solar thermal power plant are compared from the exergetic viewpoint. The Rankine cycle design is a conventional, single reheat design with five closed and one open extraction feedwater heaters. The software package GateCycle is used for the thermodynamic simulation of the Rankine cycle model. The first design configuration uses a cooling tower while the second configuration uses an air cooled condenser. With this exergy analysis we identify the location, magnitude and the sources or thermodynamic inefficiencies in this thermal system. This information is very useful for improving the overall efficiency of the power system and for comparing the performance of both technologies.
Keywords: Exergy analysis; Exergy destruction; Solar thermal power plant; Rankine cycle; Cooling tower; Air cooled condenser (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210005128
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:4:p:1966-1972
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.033
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().