 Comparison of various alkaline pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomassYong Cheol Park and Jun Seok Kim Energy, 2012, vol. 47, issue 1, 31-35 Abstract: This study compares the efficacy of soaking and percolation pretreatments with alkaline solutions for lignocellulosic biomass. The pretreated biomasses underwent enzymatic hydrolysis. Various biomasses such as rice straw and barley were pretreated by soaking processes in various alkaline solutions including sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, aqueous ammonia and sodium carbonate. The enzymatic digestibility of rice straw and barley that had been pretreated by soaking in aqueous ammonia was 85% and 95%, respectively. Eucalyptus residue, Larix leptolepis and Pinus rigida exhibited relatively low enzymatic digestibility in the range of 3.2%–8.3%. Nevertheless, the enzymatic digestibility of pretreated eucalyptus residue was increased by five times compared to that of the initial biomass. In the pretreatment of eucalyptus residue, delignification was more than doubled with percolation pretreatment compared to soaking pretreatment. The enzymatic digestibility of the percolation pretreated eucalyptus residue was increased 12 times. Keywords: Lignocellulosic biomass; Pretreatment; Alkaline solution; Eucalyptus residue; Percolation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:47:y:2012:i:1:p:31-35 DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.010 Access Statistics for this article Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser More articles in Energy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.