EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Public opinion on renewable energy technologies in Portugal

Fernando Ribeiro, Paula Ferreira, Madalena Araújo and Ana Cristina Braga

Energy, 2014, vol. 69, issue C, 39-50

Abstract: The public opinion on renewable energy technologies was analyzed by means of a survey implemented in Portugal. The survey addresses four technologies: hydro, wind, biomass and solar power. The results show that biomass is the least known technology, while hydro power is the most known. There is a generally positive attitude towards new renewable energy projects, and this tendency is more pronounced for solar power, while the case with lowest but still large support is the one of new hydro power plants. NIMBYism is more pronounced in municipalities with biomass, although not felt by the vast majority of their population. Solar power plants are regarded by the Portuguese public as the most desirable technology in terms of economic and environmental aspects, while hydro power is perceived as the technology that can contribute most to local residents' welfare. Willingness to pay is high among those who perceive renewables as increasing the costs of the electricity, but few respondents believe that renewables tend to raise the electricity bill. This study shows that the Portuguese are generally supportive of the development of more renewable energy projects in the country, and apparently these will not be subject to much local opposition excepting, perhaps, biomass.

Keywords: Survey; Public opinion; Social acceptance; Renewable energy technology; NIMBY; Portugal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213009419
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:39-50

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.074

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:39-50