Thermo-ecological and exergy replacement costs of nickel processing

Adriana Domínguez, Lucyna Czarnowska, Alicia Valero, Wojciech Stanek and Antonio Valero

Energy, 2014, vol. 72, issue C, 103-114

Abstract: In this paper, an exergy analysis of nickel processing is performed through the application of two methodologies: TEC (thermo-ecological cost) and ERC (exergy replacement cost). The merging of both methodologies allows to have a complete assessment of non-fuel mineral processing. TEC evaluates the cumulative consumption of non-renewable exergy required to produce a unit of useful product from the raw materials contained in natural deposits, i.e. from the cradle to the market. It further splits the results into the fuel, mineral and emission components so as to show the exergy consumption resulting from each part, thereby identifying the types of resources that are being consumed in each step of the overall production process. A problem detected with the TEC was that the exergy associated with the mineral component was small compared to that of fuels. This is because the TEC traditionally uses the chemical exergy of substances in their assessment and fossil fuels eclipse any other raw material. In order to overcome such issue, the TEC has been complemented with the ERC. The latter accounts for the exergy required to produce minerals from a completely dispersed state to the original conditions in which they were originally found in nature, i.e. the exergy that one would consume to restore minerals from the grave to the cradle. Through ERC, the aim is to account for the dispersion problem associated with minerals, because the scarcer a mineral, the more exergy is associated with its replacement. Results show that when ERC is embedded into the TEC infrastructure, the impacts associated with mineral consumption are significantly greater. Accordingly, the inclusion of ERC into TEC allows for a more comprehensive consumption of non-fuel mineral resources, thereby providing better indications as to the achievement of a more sustainable production.

Keywords: Exergy analysis; Thermo-ecological cost (TEC); Exergoecology; Exergy replacement cost (ERC); Nickel processing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214005623
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p:103-114

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.013

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().