Rethinking how to support intermittent renewables

Patrick A. Narbel

Energy, 2014, vol. 77, issue C, 414-421

Abstract: Few intermittent renewable power projects would have been deployed if specific policy instruments had not been implemented. Common policy instruments include the feed-in tariff, the feed-in premium and the quota system. Based on a numerical analysis, this paper shows that these specific policy instruments do not necessarily facilitate the deployment of valuable energy sources because they ignore the cost of intermittency. A valuable intermittent energy source is defined here as a source of energy which requires little financial support and which limits the need for capacity payments in order to ensure the security of supply. Based on insights from the numerical analysis, a new policy instrument is suggested: a multiplicative premium. This type of policy instrument would be a least cost approach to securing a certain quantity of intermittent generation.

Keywords: Intermittent renewables; Value of energy; Security of supply (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214010822
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:77:y:2014:i:c:p:414-421

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.026

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().