Comparing the life cycle impacts of using harvest residue as feedstock for small- and large-scale bioenergy systems (part I)

Julian Cleary and John P. Caspersen

Energy, 2015, vol. 88, issue C, 917-926

Abstract: In part I of our two-part study, we compare the timing-adjusted GHG (greenhouse gas) balance and life cycle impacts of potentially using harvest residue (unmerchantable small-diameter roundwood) in an existing large (211 MWe) wood pellet-fired (formerly coal-fired) power plant in Ontario, Canada, versus a hypothetical small (250 kWe) wood chip gasification plant that recovers heat in addition to producing electricity. Although the large, retrofitted power plant has a higher electrical efficiency, the small plant has lower environmental impacts (TRACI 2.1), mainly due to the benefits of drying the biomass inputs with recovered heat, having a shorter fuel shipping distance, and reduced biomass processing. The small plant emits 38 g of fossil fuel-derived CO2 eq./kWh, versus 134 g/kWh from its large-scale counterpart. Although these GHG emissions are insignificant relative to the forest carbon emissions from gasification and combustion (1.3–1.4 kg CO2/kWh), the harvest residue would have decomposed over time had it been left on the forest floor. After 100 years, forest carbon storage decreases by 3.8–4.1 kg from the sustained production of 1 kWh of electricity per year. The decline in carbon storage delays net GHG mitigation by 4 (small-scale system) to 7 years (large-scale system) when displacing electricity from coal.

Keywords: Bioenergy; Emissions timing; GHG mitigation; Harvest residue; Life cycle assessment; Scale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215009408
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:88:y:2015:i:c:p:917-926

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.045

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().