Experimental investigation of torrefaction of two agricultural wastes of different composition using RSM (response surface methodology)

Hyungseok Nam and Sergio Capareda

Energy, 2015, vol. 91, issue C, 507-516

Abstract: A torrefaction study using RS (rice straw) and CS (cotton stalk) was carried out to better understand the effects of the process conditions and the different compositions of biomass on the changes in the properties of the products based on the RSM (response surface methodology). The comparison of energy yield, energy densification, and main torrefaction parameters were evaluated through a complete analysis of products. The optimal conditions for the highest energy yield were obtained at the least severe conditions of 210 °C for 20min. The weight reduction of raw biomass after torrefaction was 13–48% for RS and 9–50% for CS, and the energy recovery for the solid product was over 77% for RS and 68% for CS. The highest heating value of the torrefied product was determined to be 28.6 MJ/kg. When it comes to energy densification, RS showed a higher degree of densification than CS. The maximum densified values were obtained as 1.48 for RS and 1.37 for CS, which can contribute to alleviating transportation and storage difficulties. Based on the statistical analysis, torrefaction for RS was mainly affected by temperature, while the main condition for CS torrefaction was the interaction of temperature and time.

Keywords: Torrefaction; Thermochemical conversion process; Lignocellulosic biomass; Rice straw; Cotton stalk; Response surface methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215011408
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:91:y:2015:i:c:p:507-516

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.064

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().