Improving utility conservation programs: Outcomes, interventions, and evaluations
Larry Condelli,
Dane Archer,
Elliot Aronson,
Barbara Curbow,
Beverly McLeod,
Thomas F. Pettigrew,
Lawrence T. White and
Suzanne Yates
Energy, 1984, vol. 9, issue 6, 485-494
Abstract:
Four major California utility companies have active energy conservation programs mandated by the State's Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). These companies evaluate their programs and send reports of the evaluations to the CPUC. A review of 213 of these reports revealed a marketing research approach toward promoting conservation. Advertising and informational campaigns characterize most programs, and attitudes and self-reported behavior were the major outcome measures. This approach is shown to be ineffective. Suggestions for improvement include: 1.(1) the use of actual energy consumption as the primary outcome measure in evaluating conservation programs;2.(2) the abandonment of conventional advertising, and the use of it only for the promotion of “hard” interventions;3.(3) increased use of social diffusion methods to disseminate information;4.(4) the design of more effective educational material by incorporating cognitive social psychological principles; and5.(5) the utilization of “hard” interventions that have a direct, verifiable link to conservation.
Date: 1984
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544284900288
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:9:y:1984:i:6:p:485-494
DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(84)90028-8
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().