People’s reasons for wanting to complete probation: Use and predictive validity in an e-health intervention

Stephanie A. Spohr, Faye S. Taxman and Scott T. Walters

Evaluation and Program Planning, 2017, vol. 61, issue C, 144-149

Abstract: The criminal justice system tends to emphasize external contingencies (e.g., fees, jail time) to motivate offender compliance. However, people’s reasons for desistance vary considerably. This study evaluated the acceptability, utility, and predictive validity of questions that ask about people’s reasons for wanting to successfully complete probation. Substance-using probationers (N=113) participated in a web-based computer intervention that targeted substance use and treatment initiation. Questions around seven dimensions of reasons for completing probation were developed to provide tailored feedback during the web-based program. A principle components factor analysis found that survey items loaded onto two distinct factors. Factor one, “Tangible Loss” focused on external and present-focused reasons. Factor two, “Better Life” focused on internal and future-focused reasons. There was a significant negative association between Better Life scores and days of substance use after two months (β=−0.31, SE=0.13, p<0.05). There was a significant positive association with Better Life scores and days of treatment attendance (β=1.46, SE=0.26, p<0.001). Tangible Loss scores were no associated with substance use and treatment attendance. These findings may help to create more effective motivational tracks in e-health interventions, and may complement traditional motivation measures with an explicit focus on people’s stated reasons for wanting to complete probation.

Keywords: Criminal justice; Substance abuse; Factor analysis; Behavior change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718916300763
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:144-149

DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.001

Access Statistics for this article

Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell

More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().