To evaluate or not: Evaluability study of 40 interventions of Belgian development cooperation

Nathalie Holvoet, Dirk Van Esbroeck, Liesbeth Inberg, Lisa Popelier, Bob Peeters and Ellen Verhofstadt

Evaluation and Program Planning, 2018, vol. 67, issue C, 189-199

Abstract: Due to an increasing importance of evaluations within development cooperation, it has become all the more important to analyse if initial conditions for quality and relevant evaluations are met. This article presents the findings from an evaluability study of 40 interventions of Belgian development cooperation. A study framework was developed focusing on three key dimensions (i.e. theoretical evaluability, practical evaluability and the evaluation context) and subdivided over the different OECD/DAC criteria. Drawing upon a combination of desk and field research, the study framework was subsequently applied on a set of 40 interventions in Benin, DRC, Rwanda and Belgium. Findings highlight that the context dimension scores remarkably better than the theoretical and practical evaluability in particular. The large majority of the interventions have the conditions in place to satisfactorily evaluate effectiveness and efficiency while the opposite holds for sustainability and impact in particular. These findings caution against commissioning of evaluations that ritually focus on all OECD/DAC criteria regardless of their readiness. It underscores the usefulness of a flexible ‘portfolio’ approach towards evaluations, in which a more systematic use of evaluability assessment from the start of interventions could play a role.

Keywords: Evaluability assessment; Development cooperation; Theoretical evaluability; Practical evaluability; Evaluation context; OECD/DAC criteria (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917301507
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:67:y:2018:i:c:p:189-199

DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.12.005

Access Statistics for this article

Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell

More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().