The evidence needed to demonstrate impact: A synthesis of the evidence from a phased social and emotional wellbeing intervention
Leigh-ann Onnis,
Helen Klieve and
Komla Tsey
Evaluation and Program Planning, 2018, vol. 70, issue C, 35-43
Abstract:
Policy decisions are based on evidence that demonstrates the effectiveness of interventions; however, the quantity and type of evidence that is needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention is not universally agreed upon. The aim of this study was to collaborate with researchers who have not been involved directly in Family Wellbeing interventions to lead a review of characteristics of the Family Wellbeing intervention evaluation output to date, and to assess for evidence of the FWB intervention’s impact on participants and their communities. The study found that where it is not appropriate or viable to conduct research, such as randomised control trials, alternative ways of providing evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention is vital. This review suggests that Family Wellbeing interventions are having a positive impact and promoting change in the lives of participants, their families and their communities. Hence, for complex interventions, such as those with Indigenous populations, evidence should demonstrate effectiveness against prescribed outcomes, as well as critical aspects behind how and why a complex intervention was successful.
Keywords: Family wellbeing; Aboriginal health; Social and emotional wellbeing; Phased interventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917302872
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:35-43
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.003
Access Statistics for this article
Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell
More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().