Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program

Ellison Henry, Madison R. Walker, Cheryl C. Noble, Claudia S.P. Fernandez, Giselle Corbie-Smith and Gaurav Dave

Evaluation and Program Planning, 2022, vol. 94, issue C

Abstract: Most significant change (MSC) analysis is an evaluative method used to supplement outcome and impact program evaluations. MSC stories provide mini-narratives contextualizing the effect a program had on an individual. The Clinical Scholars program evaluation team used MSC to explore learner-centric leadership outcomes of the Clinical Scholars leadership training program.

Keywords: Most significant change; Health equity; Leadership development; Qualitative analysis; Equity centered curriculum; Leadership evaluation; Healthcare providers; Outcome evaluation; Kirkpatrick (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000957
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000957

DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141

Access Statistics for this article

Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell

More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().