Identifying gender differences in risk profiles and in opioid treatment outcomes in Los Angeles County

Hortensia Amaro, Yinfei Kong, Jeanne C. Marsh, Tenie Khachikian and Erick G. Guerrero

Evaluation and Program Planning, 2023, vol. 97, issue C

Abstract: Policies and programs that aim to minimize wait time to enter opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and maximize retention respond to potential differences in female and male clients’ risk profiles. We conducted multigroup latent class analysis using significant individual risk factors. Our sample included 13,453 opioid treatment episodes from 135 unique substance use disorder treatment programs in Los Angeles County, California, in four waves: 2011 (66 programs, 1035 clients), 2013 (77 programs, 3671 clients), 2015 (75 programs, 4625 clients), and 2017 (69 programs, 4106 clients). Groups at risk of waiting longer included clients who were female, had mental health issues, received medication for OUD, had criminal justice involvement, received mandated referrals, had children in child protective services, and had caretaker responsibilities. All clients with children in protective services were likely to wait longer than those not in protective services, but women waited longer. Findings highlight that: (a) women and men in OUD treatment have significant health and social problems; (b) female and male clients have distinct risk profiles; and (c) targeted services responding to risk profiles may improve treatment access and engagement. Findings have implications for health policy and program evaluation and planning in the delivery of treatment services considering gendered risk factors.

Keywords: Los Angeles County; Gender; Opioid use disorder treatment; Health care disparities; Wait time; Retention (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923000174
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:97:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923000174

DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102240

Access Statistics for this article

Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell

More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().