Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective
Edward E. Rigdon
European Management Journal, 2016, vol. 34, issue 6, 598-605
Abstract:
Today, there is heightened controversy about the value of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling as a quantitative research method, including within the domain of European management research. Critical lines of argument within the management and psychology literature assert that there is no reason to use PLS path modeling at all. At the same time, authors using PLS path modeling continue to advance fallacious arguments to justify their choice of method. This paper identifies flaws on both sides—invalid arguments in favor of using PLS path modeling and invalid arguments opposing its use—within the context of a unifying framework and a realist philosophy of science.
Keywords: Structural equation modeling; Partial least squares path modeling; Scientific realism; Conceptual variable; Proxy variable; Measurement error (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (115)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237316300585
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eurman:v:34:y:2016:i:6:p:598-605
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... me/115/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006
Access Statistics for this article
European Management Journal is currently edited by Michael Haenlein
More articles in European Management Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().