Does regional context matter for family firm employment growth?
Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2018, vol. 9, issue 4, 293-310
This study investigates the proposition that family firms have comparative employment growth advantages in relation to non-family firms in regions with relatively low population density. This premise is tested across metropolitan, urban and rural regions using total population data on domestically and privately owned, single-plant, non-listed limited liability firms in Sweden. A panel of more than 89,000 firms is followed over a seven-year period from 2004 to 2010. The average family firm is found to grow more slowly than the average non-family firm across the urban-rural context. However, in line with the study’s conjecture, these differences are found to decrease across metropolitan, urban and rural regions.
Keywords: Family firms; Employment; Regional growth; Entrepreneur; Social capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:fambus:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:293-310
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier. ... 719791/bibliographic
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Family Business Strategy is currently edited by J.H. Astrachan
More articles in Journal of Family Business Strategy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().