Does regulatory bank oversight impact economic activity? A local projections approach
Pavel Kapinos and
Carlos Ramirez ()
Journal of Financial Stability, 2018, vol. 39, issue C, 167-174
Existing research generally finds that the magnitude of the effect of supervisory rating shocks on real economic activity is small and short-lived. This finding is puzzling because downgrades, especially substantial ones, often include lending restrictions and thus would be expected to have a strong effect on real activity. We use the local projections approach to investigate whether this anomaly can be explained by nonlinearities or asymmetric effects; our empirical results indicate that they are indeed present. In particular, we find that the effects are asymmetric: bank downgrades lead to a pronounced decline in real activity, while upgrades do not result in its increase. Furthermore, we document the presence of nonlinear effects for the downgrade—but not upgrade—shocks, as their impact increases disproportionately with its size.
Keywords: CAMELS ratings; Vector autoregression; Local projections; Asymmetries; Prudential policy; Real activity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 E37 G21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finsta:v:39:y:2018:i:c:p:167-174
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Stability is currently edited by I. Hasan, W. C. Hunter and G. G. Kaufman
More articles in Journal of Financial Stability from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().