Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: An application to fuel break management in Spain
Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu (),
Pere Riera and
Mario Soliño ()
Journal of Forest Economics, 2014, vol. 20, issue 3, 212-222
Cheap talk (CT) scripts have been broadly tested in contingent valuation studies to mitigate the effects of hypothetical bias. However, this approach may not fully be adequate when the individual is faced with several choices such as in discrete choice experiments (DCE) because the respondent may tend to forget about the CT script. This paper tests the effects of a single opt-out reminder (SOOR) to lower the hypothetical bias in a DCE dealing with the valuation of social preferences for forest fire prevention programs in Southern Spain. Results show that the inclusion of a SOOR does not contribute sufficiently to improve the CT effect on the DCE data.
Keywords: Cheap talk; Discrete choice experiment; Random parameters models; Scale parameters; Wildfires; Willingness to pay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:212-222
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier. ... 701775/bibliographic
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Forest Economics is currently edited by P. Gong and R. BrÃ¤nnlund
More articles in Journal of Forest Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nithya Sathishkumar ().