Economics at your fingertips  

Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: An application to fuel break management in Spain

Elsa Varela, Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu (), Marek Giergiczny, Pere Riera and Mario Soliño ()

Journal of Forest Economics, 2014, vol. 20, issue 3, 212-222

Abstract: Cheap talk (CT) scripts have been broadly tested in contingent valuation studies to mitigate the effects of hypothetical bias. However, this approach may not fully be adequate when the individual is faced with several choices such as in discrete choice experiments (DCE) because the respondent may tend to forget about the CT script. This paper tests the effects of a single opt-out reminder (SOOR) to lower the hypothetical bias in a DCE dealing with the valuation of social preferences for forest fire prevention programs in Southern Spain. Results show that the inclusion of a SOOR does not contribute sufficiently to improve the CT effect on the DCE data.

Keywords: Cheap talk; Discrete choice experiment; Random parameters models; Scale parameters; Wildfires; Willingness to pay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier. ... 701775/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.05.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Forest Economics is currently edited by P. Gong and R. Brännlund

More articles in Journal of Forest Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nithya Sathishkumar ().

Page updated 2021-04-02
Handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:212-222