Equilibrium selection in sequential games with imperfect information
Jon Eguia,
Aniol Llorente-Saguer,
Rebecca Morton and
Antonio Nicolo'
Games and Economic Behavior, 2018, vol. 109, issue C, 465-483
Abstract:
Games with imperfect information often feature multiple equilibria, which depend on beliefs off the equilibrium path. Standard selection criteria such as passive, symmetric or wary beliefs rest on ad hoc restrictions on beliefs. We propose a new selection criterion that imposes no restrictions on beliefs: we select the action profile that is supported in equilibrium by the largest set of beliefs. We conduct an experiment to compare the predictive power of the existing and our novel selection criteria in an application on vertical multi-lateral contracting. We find that our criterion outperforms the other selection criteria.
Keywords: Equilibrium selection; Passive beliefs; Symmetric beliefs; Vertical contracting; Multiple equilibria; Imperfect information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C92 D86 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825618300162
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Equilibrium Selection in Sequential Games with Imperfect Information (2014) 
Working Paper: Equilibrium Selection in Sequential Games with Imperfect Information (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:465-483
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2018.01.008
Access Statistics for this article
Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai
More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().