Do sellers exploit biased beliefs of buyers? An experiment
Lukas M. Wenner
Games and Economic Behavior, 2018, vol. 110, issue C, 194-215
I study experimental markets in which sellers interact with buyers who have biased beliefs about characteristics of the product sold. I examine whether such buyers can be exploited by sellers through the use of specifically designed pricing structures. Theoretically, I show that a necessary condition for exploitation is consumer naiveté about their belief bias, otherwise they infer their biased beliefs from the sellers' actions. My main experimental result establishes that whether exploitation arises depends on how difficult it is for buyers to make such inferences. When sellers can only make take-it-or-leave-it offers, no exploitation arises. If, however, contracts are agreed upon by bilateral bargaining, sellers earn higher profits compared to the case with unbiased beliefs. I present evidence that in the former case buyers anticipate and prevent exploitation. In the latter case, the richer interaction structure makes it harder for buyers to infer the sellers' incentives, leading to exploitation.
Keywords: Biased beliefs; Consumer exploitation; Laboratory experiment; Behavioral IO; Consumer sophistication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D03 D83 L15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:110:y:2018:i:c:p:194-215
Access Statistics for this article
Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai
More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().