Grouping, in-group bias and the cost of cheating

Moti Michaeli

Games and Economic Behavior, 2020, vol. 121, issue C, 90-107

Abstract: The tendency of people to divide into groups and to show in-group bias – preferential treatment for insiders – is widely observed. This paper shows that it arises naturally when people incur a moral cost when defecting against cooperators, provided that this cost is concave in the number of such defections. If some people are asocial, i.e. insusceptible to the moral cost, then, under incomplete information, free-riding and cooperation can coexist within groups. Costly signaling of sociality enables groups to screen out free-riders, but its availability may decrease the welfare of all individuals in society. Finally, the concave moral cost is shown to be evolutionary stable with respect to an invasion by a convex mutation.

Keywords: In-group bias; Group formation; Costly signaling; PD game; Social identity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D03 D64 D7 D82 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825620300166
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:121:y:2020:i:c:p:90-107

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2020.02.002

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().