EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Minimax regret and failure to converge to efficiency in large markets

Rachel C. Shafer

Games and Economic Behavior, 2020, vol. 124, issue C, 281-287

Abstract: This paper studies minimax regret traders in a sealed bid double auction. Unlike the expected utility maximizers that populate typical market models, these traders do not determine their actions using a single prior. The analysis proves that, with no restrictions on beliefs about others' types and strategies, minimax regret traders will not converge to price-taking as the size of the market increases, contrary to standard economic intuition. In fact, minimax regret traders' bids and asks are invariant to the number of traders in the market. Thus, the robustness of the sealed bid double auction is sensitive to traders' preferences.

Keywords: Double auctions; Regret minimization; Ambiguity; Decision theory; Mechanism design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D44 D81 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825620301020
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:124:y:2020:i:c:p:281-287

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2020.07.010

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-30
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:124:y:2020:i:c:p:281-287