 Economic polarization and antisocial behavior: An experimentMaria Bigoni, Stefania Bortolotti and Efşan Nas Özen Games and Economic Behavior, 2021, vol. 126, issue C, 387-401 Abstract: Economic inequality may fuel frustration, possibly leading to anger and antisocial behavior. We experimentally study a situation where only the rich can reduce inequality while the poor can express their discontent by destroying the wealth of a rich counterpart with whom they had no previous interaction. We test whether the emergence of antisocial behavior depends only on the level of inequality, or also on the conditions under which inequality occurs. We compare an environment in which the rich can unilaterally reduce inequality with one where generosity makes them vulnerable to exploitation by the poor. We observe more antisocial behavior when reducing inequality would be safe for the rich. This cannot be rationalized by inequality aversion alone, while it is in line with models of anger as the result of frustrated expectations. Indeed, the rich are expected to be more generous in the safe scenario, but this hope is systematically violated. Keywords: Expectations; Frustration; Inequality aversion; Money-burning; Punishment (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:126:y:2021:i:c:p:387-401 DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2020.12.006 Access Statistics for this article Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.