EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Projection bias in effort choices

Marc Kaufmann

Games and Economic Behavior, 2022, vol. 135, issue C, 368-393

Abstract: I model individuals working on a long-term task who, due to projection bias, underestimate changes in marginal disutility. At the start of each day, when current marginal disutility is low, such individuals overestimate how much they will work, and as they grow tired from working, they plan to work less and less. Despite these fluctuating plans, when they face decreasing returns to effort, they work optimally, yet if they commit in advance, they overcommit. When facing increasing returns, they may repeatedly start and quit, working when rested only to give up as they grow tired. In all-or-nothing tasks, starting-and-quitting can lead to wasted effort on never-to-be-completed tasks, or to completing them by working inefficiently little early on.

Keywords: Projection bias; Increasing returns; Multi-tasking; Time inconsistency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 D90 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825622001130
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Projection Bias in Effort Choices (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:135:y:2022:i:c:p:368-393

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2022.07.002

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:135:y:2022:i:c:p:368-393