Too big to prevail: The paradox of power in coalition formation
Changxia Ke,
Florian Morath,
Anthony Newell and
Lionel Page
Games and Economic Behavior, 2022, vol. 135, issue C, 394-410
Abstract:
In standard coalition games, players try to form a coalition to secure a prize and a coalition agreement specifies how the prize is to be split among its members. However, in practical situations where coalitions are formed, the actual split of the prize often takes place after the coalition formation stage. This creates the possibility for some players to ask for a renegotiation of the initial split. We predict that, in such situations, a player can suffer from being “too strong”. Our experimental results confirm that, when the actual split of the prize is delayed, a player's strength can turn into a strategic disadvantage: a greater voting power in forming a winning coalition is undermined by the threat of being overly powerful when a split is determined. This result is relevant to many real world situations where “too strong” players find it paradoxically hard to form coalitions with weaker players.
Keywords: Shapley value; (Non) Binding agreement; Balance of power; Communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 C92 D72 D74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825622000896
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Too Big to Prevail: The Paradox of Power in Coalition Formation (2021) 
Working Paper: Too big to prevail: The paradox of power in coalition formation (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:135:y:2022:i:c:p:394-410
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2022.04.006
Access Statistics for this article
Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai
More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().