 Competitive cheap talkZhuozheng Li, Heikki Rantakari and Huanxing Yang Games and Economic Behavior, 2016, vol. 96, issue C, 65-89 Abstract: We study a competitive cheap talk model with two senders. Each sender is responsible for a single project and observes its return. Exactly one project will be implemented. Both senders share some common interests with the principal, but have own-project biases. Under simultaneous communication, all equilibria are shown to be partition equilibria, but all the equilibria can no longer be ranked ex ante in terms of Pareto efficiency. The payoff of the principal depends on both the total conflict between the agents and the asymmetry in the own-project biases. In the equilibrium preferred by the principal, the agent with a smaller bias always has veto power to determine which alternative is implemented and weakly more messages. In any given equilibrium, decreasing the own-project bias of one agent improves the precision of communication by both agents. Finally, sequential communication and simple delegation are shown to be essentially outcome-equivalent to simultaneous communication. Keywords: Cheap talk; Multiple senders; Competition (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:65-89 DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2016.01.010 Access Statistics for this article Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.