EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Internal hierarchy and stable coalition structures

Massimo Morelli () and In-Uck Park

Games and Economic Behavior, 2016, vol. 96, issue C, 90-96

Abstract: In deciding whether to join a coalition or not, an agent must consider both i) the expected power of the coalition and ii) her position in the vertical structure within the coalition. We establish the existence of a positive relationship between the degree of inequality in remuneration within coalitions and the number of coalitions to be formed endogenously in stable systems. We show that such coalitions can be mixed and balanced, rather than segregated, in terms of members' ability levels. In any stable system each coalition is of an efficient size and every agent is paid her marginal contribution.

Keywords: Stable systems; Abilities; Cyclic partition; Non-segregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 D71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825616000117
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Internal Hierarchy and Stable Coalition Structures (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Internal Hierarchy and Stable Coalition Structures (2011) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:90-96

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2016.01.007

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:90-96