Search prominence and return costs
Arthur Fishman and
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2018, vol. 58, issue C, 136-161
It is widely held that sellers prefer to appear early in a consumer’s search, but evidence suggests this need not be the case. We develop a model which incorporates costly search and costly return and demonstrate that appearing later may be better. When return is free, prominence is desirable by standard logic, however costly return induces a tradeoff – it benefits an earlier seller by reducing the initial search but also benefits a later seller by preventing return conditional on search. We show that for small search costs later is better whenever high outcomes have a low likelihood, or whenever two independent match value draws are likely to be near one another. Later can still be better if sellers compete in prices prior to search. Finally, with many sellers the optimal position may be first, last, or in between but earlier positions are favored as the number of sellers grows.
Keywords: Search position; Consumer search; Search with costly recall; Search prominence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:indorg:v:58:y:2018:i:c:p:136-161
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Industrial Organization is currently edited by P. Bajari, B. Caillaud and N. Gandal
More articles in International Journal of Industrial Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().