EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comovement in GDP trends and cycles among trading partners

Bruce Blonigen, Jeremy Piger () and Nicholas Sly

Journal of International Economics, 2014, vol. 94, issue 2, 239-247

Abstract: It has long been recognized that business cycle comovement is greater between countries that trade more intensively with one another. However, nations face shocks to both the cyclical and trend components of their GDP series. Contrary to the result for cyclical fluctuations, we find comovement of shocks to the trend component of real GDP is weaker among countries that trade more intensively with one another. We simulate changes in ten-year output growth correlations corresponding to the estimated effects of trade and show that the impact of trade on trend comovement is quantitatively more important than its effect on cyclical comovement.

Keywords: Output comovement; International business cycles; Trade linkages (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F42 C22 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199614000919
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Comovement in GDP Trends and Cycles Among Trading Partners (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:94:y:2014:i:2:p:239-247

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-09-08
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:94:y:2014:i:2:p:239-247