Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach

Denis Bouyssou and Thierry Marchant

Journal of Informetrics, 2016, vol. 10, issue 1, 183-199

Abstract: This paper analyzes from an axiomatic point of view a recent proposal for counting citations: the value of a citation given by a paper is inversely proportional to the total number of papers it cites. This way of fractionally counting citations was suggested as a possible way to normalize citation counts between fields of research having different citation cultures. It belongs to the “citing-side” approach to normalization. We focus on the properties characterizing this way of counting citations when it comes to ranking authors. Our analysis is conducted within a formal framework that is more complex but also more realistic than the one usually adopted in most axiomatic analyses of this kind.

Keywords: Bibliometric ranking of authors; Field normalization; Fractional counting of citations; Axiomatization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157715301796
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:1:p:183-199

DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.006

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Informetrics is currently edited by Leo Egghe

More articles in Journal of Informetrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().