Journal of Informetrics
2007 - 2026
Current editor(s): Leo Egghe From Elsevier Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (). Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.
Volume 20, issue 3, 2026
- The dynamic scholar: How evolving co-authorship fuels scholarly performance

- Xiaoyang Lu, Chaoying Tang and Stefanie E. Naumann
- Author team size as a structural pathway of citation impact: A transformation-robust bibliometric analysis

- Shlomit Hadad, Daphne R. Raban and Noa Aharony
- AuthormetriX: automated calculation of authors’ scholarly output based on multiple non-inflationary author credit-allocation schemas, and collaboration metrics from a scopus corpus

- Samuel O. Adeosun
- A novel indicator h* to measure research efficiency and identify researchers facing challenges: Application to engineering sciences

- Alexis Rusinek, Tomasz Jankowiak and Aurélien Besnard
- Epistemic pollination: How sleeping beauty papers fertilize scientific ecosystems

- Kemal Yayla
- “What cannot be said cannot be measured”: On the philosophical foundations and limits of bibliometrics

- Juan Gorraiz
- A social media-driven disruption index for identifying disruptive research

- Zhenzhen Xu, Quan Lu, Shengzhi Huang, Fan Zhang, Junying Chen and Jin Zeng
- Biblioshiny and the SAAS Workflow: An integrated framework for transparent and reproducible science mapping. A demonstration through the replication of a study

- Massimo Aria, Corrado Cuccurullo, D’Aniello, Luca and Maria Spano
- Is equal credit really equal? The impact of academic evaluation policies on authorship decisions

- Liwei Zhang and Jue Wang
- Beyond university rankings: Classifying national higher education systems through SIR performance concentration

- Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez, Gali Halevi, Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote and Félix De-Moya-Anegón
- Distant but bridgeable: how geographic and cognitive distance jointly shape interdisciplinary knowledge production

- Alex J. Yang, Yujie Shi, Fanming Wang, Xinyu Song and Sanhong Deng
- Testing for alphabetical bias in the c-score: Implications for evaluating scientific excellence

- D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
- LLM-Assisted writing in engineering is associated with higher citations as evidenced from 1.17 million papers

- Zoie McCreery and M.Z. Naser
- Revealing country-level disparities in researchers’ transition to artificial intelligence: A two-stage analytical framework

- Saeyoung Choi and Junghye Lee
- The role of interdisciplinary funding in supporting impactful interdisciplinary research

- Bingyi Wu, Tianjun Wu, Yanmeng Xing, Xinzhi Xie and Chao Min
- CiteFairly: Toward the improvement of gendered citation practices in the software engineering field

- Karolina Tchilinguirova, Khadija Aftab, Amanuel Aknaw, Alvine Boaye Belle and Oluwafemi Odu
- A novel knowledge-entity-grounded scholarly retrieval framework in full-text academic documents

- Si Shen, Chuan Jiang, Dongbo Wang, Zhixiao Zhao, Haotian Hu, Min Song and Jia Tina Du
- The illusion of scientific talent identification through publication counts: a critical commentary on Haunschild and Bornmann

- F. Pacheco-Torgal
- Exploring the impact of super-cited papers on counting methods, counting inflation and university rankings: Evidence from engineering

- Mu-hsuan Huang, Yuntong Xiao and Xiaojuan Liu
- Does the Matthew effect exist in open peer review? An empirical study of institutional prestige effects on review outcomes

- Jeongyeon Choi, Yi Zhao and Yongjun Zhu
- The Price–Pareto growth model of networks with community structure

- Łukasz Brzozowski, Marek Gagolewski, Grzegorz Siudem and Barbara Żogała-Siudem
- The landscape of problematic papers in the field of non-coding RNA

- Ying Lou, Zhengyi Zhou, Guosheng Wang, Zhesi Shen and Menghui Li
- Modeling zero-inflated and heavy-tailed citation data using Bayesian hurdle quantile regression with flexible distributions

- Sadaf Sultana, Sajid Ali and Ismail Shah
- Network positions within scholars and intellectual networks

- Alejandro Espinosa-Rada
- Originated versus imported knowledge: Revisiting the relationship between novelty and academic impact

- Shan Huang, Jin Mao, Kun Lu and Gang Li
- Efficient peer review via a fairness-aware priority mechanism: Game theoretic modelling and evaluation

- Aya Hussein, Heba Montaser and Kyle Smith
- Who did what? A TF-IDF-based contribution metric for team science

- Ting Xiao
- The diffusion of artificial intelligence methods in scientific research: growth pattern, disciplinary variation, and task alignment

- Wen Lou, Tan Fu, Mingzhu Gao and Qianqian Xu
Volume 20, issue 2, 2026
- Evolving contributions and collaboration efficiency of individual and organizational users on Gitee

- Yizhuo Li and Yijie Cao
- The impact of mentorship on the citation-based performance of graduate dissertation: A social capital perspective

- Li Zhai and Xiangbin Yan
- Empowering the next generation: How team hierarchy relates to junior researcher retention

- Huimin Xu, Yi Bu, Meijun Liu and Ying Ding
- New indicators for capturing the balances and roles of nations in the global knowledge exchange system

- Zhe Cao, Lin Zhang, Henrik Karlstrøm, Ronald Rousseau and Gunnar Sivertsen
- Leveraging GANs for citation intent classification and its impact on citation network analysis

- Davi A. Bezerra, Filipi N. Silva and Diego R. Amancio
- A CRediT‐based quantitative study of co‐corresponding authorship: Collaboration patterns and contribution distribution

- Tian-Yuan Huang and Jie Xue
- Textual content and academic journals selectivity: A case of economic journals

- Paweł Baranowski and Szymon Wójcik
- Breaking through the constraints of academic social capital: Insights from top scientists’ collaboration strategies

- Xingpeng Liu, An Zeng and Xiaohua Cui
- AI-generated text detection via multilevel Zipf’s law

- Zhenhua Wang, Aixin Yao and Ming Ren
- The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations

- María Verónica Forchino and Daniel Torres-Salinas
- Relationship between peer review quality and scientific impact: Insights from LLMs-assessed reviews

- Zhuanlan Sun
- A review of the science of team science: Data sources, research methods, disciplinary characteristics, and research topics

- Rui Liu, Yi Zhao, Eunji Jeon, Yi Bu, Irene Li and Yongjun Zhu
- Identification of hyperauthorship in scientific publications: An approach based on outlier detection methods

- Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez, Rodríguez, J․Tinguaro, Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote and Félix de Moya-Anegón
- The hierarchical structure of research teams and its association with performance

- Guoshuai Ma, Wenjie Wang, Gangzhu Qiao and Haiwei Lei
- Coordination complexity and its impact on disruption: A functional lead perspective

- Shuo Liu, Dingkang Lin, Jianjun Sun and Jiang Li
- Paper with code diffusion on GitHub: Disruption or consolidation?

- Kun Tang, Baiyang Li and Xinyuan Zhang
- GC-GTM: A generative-convergent extension of generative topographic mapping for discovering and interpreting technology opportunities

- Hanjong Lee and Youngjung Geum
- Auditable bibliometric analysis: a generic data pipeline for research evaluation

- Abdelilah El Majjaoui, Anass El Haddadi, Abdelkhalek Bahri, Oumaima El Haddadi, Fadwa Bouhafer and Sara Ouald Chaib
- From relocation to interdisciplinary diffusion: The impact of academic mobility on mentoring direction among mathematicians

- Yunuo Wang, Yangpu Li, Yingjie Ma, Chenxia Meng, Ru Hou and Yong Zhao
- Measuring the effect of structural differences between Web of Science and Scopus on research impact assessment

- Sándor Soós, Anna Kiss and Zsófia Viktória Vida
- Unpacking the predictive power of peer review under scientific disruption: Evidence from AI research

- Yujie Zhang, Yan Jiang, Pengwei Yan, Zhuoren Jiang, Chenxi Lin, Guoxiu He and Xiaozhong Liu
- Modeling the impact of research data unavailability on science

- Jorge Chamorro-Padial, Francisco-Javier Rodrigo-Ginés, Rodríguez-Sánchez, Rosa, R.M. Gil and Roberto García
- Unveiling thematic evolution and R&D opportunities through knowledge inheritance networks: A case study in telecommunications

- Feifei Wang, Zhuoyuan Zhang, Xiao Lei, Rui Xue and Claude Baron
- Identifying the policy foci via co-word networks in the frontier fields of GenAI and GeneEdit

- Yunfan He, Xinxin Hou, Hongyu Pu, Fred Y. Ye and Star X. Zhao
Volume 20, issue 1, 2026
- Assessing scientific output through self-evaluation: Evidence from four social science fields

- Tolga Yuret
- Weak ties in scientific cooperation contribute to scientific innovation

- Yunhao You, Nian Liu and Qian Yu
- WISDOM: An AI-powered framework for emerging research detection using weak signal analysis and advanced topic modelling

- Ashkan Ebadi, Alain Auger and Yvan Gauthier
- Published peer review reports have higher informative content than unpublished reports

- Elena Álvarez-García, Daniel García-Costa, Flaminio Squazzoni, Mario Malički, Bahar Mehmani and Francisco Grimaldo
- Universities as central actors in evidence-based policymaking in the US

- Weiye Gu and Chaoqun Ni
- Sex bias in peer review and citation practices: Implications for research evaluation

- Giovanni Abramo and D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
- Tracking vibrant assignees in technological innovation: A patent-based dual perspective of activity and persistence

- Dar-Zen Chen, You-Fu Lee, Huei-Ru Dong and Chun-Chieh Wang
- Comments on the ideological and philosophical foundations of bibliometrics by Gorraiz, J

- F. Pacheco-Torgal
- A multi-dimensional indicator system for identifying highly innovative papers: a knowledge absorption, creation, and diffusion perspective

- Wei Cheng, Xiaomin Zheng, Dejun Zheng, Ming Li and Tianshi Cong
- The effect of gender diversity on scientific team impact: A team roles perspective

- Yi Zhao, Yongjun Zhu, Donghun Kim, Yuzhuo Wang, Heng Zhang, Chao Lu and Chengzhi Zhang
- Breaking barriers in academic communication: Insights from a novel face-to-face interaction tracking app at an international conference

- Kiyotaka Yabe, Mamoru Takata and Kenji Matsuura
- Does open access promote interdisciplinary knowledge flow? A Quasi-Natural experiment of journal transitions to fully OA in agronomy

- Xianwen Wang, Pengfei Jia and Weixi Xie
- λ-index: A new indicator based on generalized law in Information Production Processes

- Hiran H. Lathabai
- BiblioMerge: A Python-based automated tool to merge WoS and Scopus bibliographic data, compatible with Biblioshiny, BibExcel, VOSviewer, SciMAT and ScientoPy

- David Diez-Junguitu and Miguel Á. Peña-Cerezo
- How highly cited papers affect LIS journal impact factor? An empirical study

- Xiaojuan Liu, Nannan Xiang and Mu-hsuan Huang
- Cover effects on social attention: Evidence from Cell Biology, Multidisciplinary Chemistry, and Applied Physics

- Yezhu Wang, Yundong Xie, Qing Ye, Lu Guo and Rongting Zhou
- Design flaws in the Polish science quality evaluation system: A technical analysis of latent properties

- Tomasz P. Pawlak
- Tracing scientific knowledge flow in patents: An explainable machine learning study of citation types and their temporal dynamics

- Yu Geng, Yixian Yin, Ruonan Cai and Xianwen Wang
- Assessing data quality in citation analysis: A case study of web of science and Crossref

- Guoyang Rong, Ying Chen, Thorsten Koch and Keisuke Honda
- Author position ratio (APR): a simple complementary bibliometric descriptor of authorship patterns

- Valentí Rull
- Networks of knowledge: hiring and collaboration networks in economics and physics departments

- Deok-Young Lee, Hyungsoo Woo and Jae-Suk Yang
- Weak ties matter for scientific innovation: The dual perspectives of knowledge recombination network and collaboration network

- Keye Wu, Rhodri Ivor Leng and Wanfang Hou
- Estimating citation gaps by team size: Evidence from a cross-disciplinary analysis

- Hwiyoung P. Lee, Chelsea Zhang, Manuel S. González Canché, Yoosun Park and Ram A. Cnaan
- Corrigendum to “BiblioMerge: A Python-based automated tool to merge WoS and Scopus bibliographic data, compatible with Biblioshiny, BibExcel, VOSviewer, SciMAT and ScientoPy” [Journal of Informetrics, Volume 20, Issue 1, 2026, 1-21, 101770]

- David Diez-Junguitu and Miguel Á. Peña-Cerezo
| |