Examples for counterintuitive behavior of the new citation-rank indicator P100 for bibliometric evaluations

Michael Schreiber

Journal of Informetrics, 2014, vol. 8, issue 3, 738-748

Abstract: A new percentile-based rating scale P100 has recently been proposed to describe the citation impact in terms of the distribution of the unique citation values. Here I investigate P100 for 5 example datasets, two simple fictitious models and three larger empirical samples. Counterintuitive behavior is demonstrated in the model datasets, pointing to difficulties when the evolution with time of the indicator is analyzed or when different fields or publication years are compared. It is shown that similar problems can occur for the three larger datasets of empirical citation values. Further, it is observed that the performance evaluation result in terms of percentiles can be influenced by selecting different journals for publication of a manuscript.

Keywords: Evaluation; Citation analysis; Highly cited publications; Bibliometric rankings; Percentiles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157714000601
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:infome:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:738-748

DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.007

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Informetrics is currently edited by Leo Egghe

More articles in Journal of Informetrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().