Capital mechanisms driving parental activism in South Korea: Perspectives from parentocracy, meritocracy, and a Bourdieusian analysis of capital

Subeen Jang

International Journal of Educational Development, 2024, vol. 109, issue C

Abstract: This article considers the capital-related mechanisms behind parental activism against the Future School reform in South Korea, employing two theoretical frameworks: the parentocracy ideology and a Bourdieusian Analysis of Capital. The findings from discourse and social network (geolocational) analyses suggest that the activism is primarily driven by parents’ belief in meritocracy (testocracy), rooted in dominant educational norms. The efforts of parents to secure children's high exam scores indicate that parentocracy is a ‘continuum’ from meritocracy, rather than its next stage. The intersection of parental activism with capital and habitus highlights the complexities between parentocracy, meritocracy, and inequality, necessitating further analysis.

Keywords: Parents; Parental involvement; School reform; Educational policy; Educational inequality; Capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324001305
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:injoed:v:109:y:2024:i:c:s0738059324001305

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103104

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Educational Development is currently edited by Stephen P Heyneman

More articles in International Journal of Educational Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().