Anti-Mertonian norms undermine the scientific ethos: A critique of Bird, Jackson Jr., and Winston's policy proposals and associated justification
Michael A. Woodley of Menie,
Mateo Peñaherrera-Aguirre,
Aurelio-José Figueredo,
Geoffrey F. Miller,
Thomas R. Coyle,
Noah Carl,
Fróði Debes,
Craig L. Frisby,
Federico R. Léon,
Guy Madison and
Heiner Rindermann
Intelligence, 2025, vol. 108, issue C
Abstract:
We make the case that Bird, Jackson Jr., and Winston's (BJ&W; 2024) policy proposals boil down to a rejection of Merton's (1942) traditional scientific norms of communality, universalism, disinterestedness, and organized skepticism, and a demand for anti-Mertonian norms to be imposed, top down, upon psychological science. Their anti-Mertonian norms (specifically secrecy, particularism, interestedness, and organized dogmatism) are at odds with the scientific ethos. We highlight problems with their argument that Racial Hereditarian Research (RHR) is uniquely "socially pernicious". We then discuss adverse effects that their imposition of anti-Mertonian norms would likely cause in relation to: 1) instances of research on racial and ethnic differences that have produced findings agreeable to egalitarianism, and which would be proscribed under their framework; 2) the fomenting of genuinely scientifically racist beliefs that are empirically at odds with RHR; and 3) the chilling effect on other areas of science whose findings have also been misused, including “mainstream human genetics”. Ultimately, we observe that BJ&W's anti-Mertonian policy prescriptions are unworkable in practice, and would be highly damaging to psychological science if widely enforced.
Keywords: Harm; Lysenkoism; Mertonian norms; Racism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000734
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intell:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0160289624000734
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2024.101879
Access Statistics for this article
Intelligence is currently edited by R.J. Haier
More articles in Intelligence from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().