How biased are U.S. government forecasts of the federal debt?

Neil Ericsson

International Journal of Forecasting, 2017, vol. 33, issue 2, 543-559

Abstract: Government debt and its forecasts attracted considerable attention during the recent financial crisis. The current paper analyzes potential biases in different U.S. government agencies’ one-year-ahead forecasts of U.S. gross federal debt over 1984–2012. Standard tests typically fail to detect biases in these forecasts. However, impulse indicator saturation (IIS) detects economically large and highly significant time-varying biases, particularly at turning points in the business cycle. These biases do not appear to be politically related. IIS defines a generic procedure for examining forecast properties; it explains why standard tests fail to detect bias; and it provides a mechanism for potentially improving forecasts.

Keywords: Autometrics; Bias; Debt; Federal government; Forecasts; Impulse indicator saturation; Projections; United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207016300905
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: How Biased Are U.S. Government Forecasts of the Federal Debt? (2017)
Working Paper: How Biased Are U.S. Government Forecasts of the Federal Debt? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:33:y:2017:i:2:p:543-559

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2016.09.001

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman

More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().