Teaching quality and academic research
Rosa Rodríguez and
International Review of Economics Education, 2016, vol. 23, issue C, 10-27
This paper studies the relation between teaching quality and research productivity using a detailed database for students in higher education. In order to measure teaching quality, we employ a version of the value-added methodology which uses future performance of students to make inferences about the current teaching quality of their professors. We report a mild but positive and significant relation between publications on top journals and teaching quality. To all practical effects, this finding does not seem to be contaminated by the potential negotiating power of professors with high levels of top publications strategically choosing the best-performing groups. Additionally, we report evidence that the random assignment of students into class groups is reasonably satisfied. Finally, we argue that teaching effectiveness measures based on anonymous student evaluations are suspicious and debatable.
Keywords: Academic research; Teaching quality; Value-added; Student questionnaire; Standardized grade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ireced:v:23:y:2016:i:c:p:10-27
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Economics Education is currently edited by Guest, Ross
More articles in International Review of Economics Education from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().