EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does the timing of assessment matter? Circadian mismatch and reflective processing in university students

B.I. Oyebode and Nicky Nicholls

International Review of Economics Education, 2021, vol. 38, issue C

Abstract: University students are required to engage with new content and to be assessed at specific times of the day. Research has shown that circadian rhythms differ between individuals, with impacts on optimal functioning times. We investigate the extent to which deliberate, reflective thinking (critical for university level tasks) is impacted by the timing of tasks and the interaction of task timing with circadian rhythms. We use Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) questions to assess students’ ability to use reflective thinking. By grouping students according to their diurnal preference (morning types or evening types), we either match or mismatch the timing of the CRT assessment with diurnal preference. We find that students experiencing circadian mismatch (morning types being assessed in the evening, or evening types being assessed in the morning) perform significantly worse on the CRT, suggesting less ability to invoke reflective thinking at times of circadian mismatch. This finding suggests that timing important assessments during the day, rather than in the early morning or evening, might improve performance of mismatched students.

Keywords: Assessment; Cognitive reflection test; Higher education; Circadian mismatch (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D91 I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388021000189
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ireced:v:38:y:2021:i:c:s1477388021000189

DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2021.100226

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics Education is currently edited by Guest, Ross

More articles in International Review of Economics Education from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:38:y:2021:i:c:s1477388021000189