Optimal discretion in asylum lawmaking

Jenny Helstroffer and Marie Obidzinski

International Review of Law and Economics, 2010, vol. 30, issue 1, 86-97

Abstract: This paper develops a regulatory competition model to study whether and how refugee law should be centralized, and what are the consequences for refugees and for host countries. Varying refugee flows across countries lead some destinations to adopt strict measures. The resulting externality leads to a generalized "race to the bottom" of asylum law. Neither fixed nor minimum standard harmonization are found to be in the interest of both host countries. Especially the most popular destinations like EU border countries would suffer from losing discretion. However, minimum standards would benefit refugees and less popular destinations.

Keywords: Competition; in; law; making; Asylum; law; European; law; Flexible; law; Human; rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144-8188(09)00070-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Optimal discretion in asylum lawmaking (2010)
Working Paper: Optimal discretion in asylum lawmaking (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:86-97

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. Schäfer

More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().