Choosing ADR or litigation
Dominique Demougin () and
International Review of Law and Economics, 2017, vol. 49, issue C, 33-40
We model the decision by two contestants to select one of two conflict resolution forums in which to address their conflict; alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or litigation. Given a forum, we represent the parties’ behavior by a Tullock contest. Because of the additional constraints disputants face in courts, we assume that the cost structure of providing effective legal arguments is higher under litigation. Paradoxically, litigation may be procedurally more efficient in equilibrium. The final choice of the parties is based on their respective utility and we show that a tension may arise with procedural efficiency. Finally, we also show that the timing of the decision of the conflict resolution mechanism (before or after the conflict arises) affects the choices the parties make.
Keywords: Litigation; Alternative dispute resolution; Conflict resolution; Tullock game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:49:y:2017:i:c:p:33-40
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. SchÃ¤fer
More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().